![]() I'm sure useability is a whole other topic, however, and here personal preferences play a part as much as anything. In other words, assuming the Epson software for the V750 isn't somehow defective, and given experienced users of each, I'd expect to see pretty much what you've seen Patrick. Calculating backwards from the image dimensions as scanned, Epson Scan managed around 14. Each of the three packages has strengths and weaknesses in terms of getting what I want - again a topic for another posting - but if you know how to use them, each can get you where you need to go in terms of quality. SilverFast trails both its rivals by some distance. What isn't identical are the hoops I need to jump through to get those results. In other words, with experience and used the way I use them, the results are, for all intents and purposes, identical. ![]() I can get the results I want from any of these three packages. ![]() Thus, I don't use any "advanced" features in any software package. Everything else I'd rather do in PS, where I'm more comfortable with masking, layers etc and can get better results. I want a very neutral image with proper exposure (a subject in itself which could occupy a posting) and good color balance. What I want from an initial scan is pretty simple. Before I comment further, let me display my bias. With my current Nikon, I've used Silverfast AI, Vuescan and Nikon Scan 4. I've been scanning a variety of films for some years now with a variety of scanners and software. thanks.Įllis writes: I think I know how to scan -I'm nearly neurotic and definitely obsessive when it comes to making scans.ĭitto. Those of you who know how to scan and use both of them. To scan whit Epson, are they suposse to get the same result? like to ear from If you take a guy who know how to scan with SilverFast, and another who know how Plus, when whe use SMART SHARPEN on the file, the difference whereĪlmost things of the past. Whe can see a small difference in certain area, but notĮnought to use a software that took double the time to set to get a similar After studying it for couple of minutes, whe cannot see majorĭifference between the 2 scans to say that SilverFast was or not way better thenĮpson genuine software. Whe then blow them up on screen at the same ACTUAL PIXEL and put them sideīy side. SilverFast software to show me i was lost, but i ask him to remove the AUTO Images will benefit from SilverFasts intelligent automatic functions which help to make the process of adjusting images much easier. After a couple of minute, minimal adjutsment, i get a scan made atĢ400ppi, in both color RGB and in 16 bit Grayscale. SilverFast SE 5.5 is a powerful tool created for entry-level users. Sharpness (medium) in the scan process to remove the out of focus associate with Software on color and BW medium format film, i scan as usual, add a little That with SilverFast you get so much details that if you dont use it you migthĪs well not use a scanner : ) So whe made a test! again. “The entire system of making the 64-bit scans and HDR processing is much more efficient and quicker than I had imagined it could be, so it is something I can recommend, and will look forward to further testing with a release version of both applications.I test both of the software last weekend, my friend wouldtn want to use anythingĮlse than SilverFast, i told him that i use Epson software myself. film holders for slides, 35mm filmstrips and medium-format panoramic filmĭavid Brooks, professional photographer and senior editor of Shutterbug Magazine, has tested a pre-release SilverFast Archive Suite on the V600:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |